Multiple Agents
5
Incidents
4.8
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Other
2
Infinite Loop
1
Logic Error
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0032 10/10Scan of 5,600 vibe-coded apps found 2,000+ high-impact vulns, 400+ exposed secrets, PII leaks
Multiple Llms
3
Incidents
3.8
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Hallucination
3
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0033 6.4/10Slopsquatting: LLMs hallucinate package names attackers pre-register (react-codeshift, unused-imports)
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Multiple Agents | Multiple Llms |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Severity | 4.8/10 | 3.8/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 1 | 0 |
| Top Failure Mode | Other | Hallucination |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Multiple Agents or Multiple Llms more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Multiple Agents has 5 documented failures (avg severity 4.8/10) while Multiple Llms has 3 (avg severity 3.8/10). Multiple Llms shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Multiple Agents and Multiple Llms failures?
Multiple Agents's most common failure mode is other, while Multiple Llms most commonly fails via hallucination. Multiple Agents has 1 critical incidents vs Multiple Llms's 0.