Manus
1
Incidents
7.5
Avg Severity
0
Critical
1
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0063 7.5/10Manus AI leaked its own system prompt when a user simply asked it to read its internal directory
Multiple Agents
5
Incidents
4.8
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Other
2
Infinite Loop
1
Logic Error
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0032 10/10Scan of 5,600 vibe-coded apps found 2,000+ high-impact vulns, 400+ exposed secrets, PII leaks
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Manus | Multiple Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Severity | 7.5/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 0 | 1 |
| Top Failure Mode | Security Vulnerability | Other |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Manus or Multiple Agents more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Manus has 1 documented failures (avg severity 7.5/10) while Multiple Agents has 5 (avg severity 4.8/10). Multiple Agents shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Manus and Multiple Agents failures?
Manus's most common failure mode is security vulnerability, while Multiple Agents most commonly fails via other. Manus has 0 critical incidents vs Multiple Agents's 1.