Lovable
1
Incidents
10.0
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0031 10/10Lovable-built apps inverted access control, exposing 170+ production databases (CVE-2025-48757)
Multiple Llms
3
Incidents
3.8
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Hallucination
3
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0033 6.4/10Slopsquatting: LLMs hallucinate package names attackers pre-register (react-codeshift, unused-imports)
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Lovable | Multiple Llms |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Severity | 10.0/10 | 3.8/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 1 | 0 |
| Top Failure Mode | Security Vulnerability | Hallucination |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lovable or Multiple Llms more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Lovable has 1 documented failures (avg severity 10.0/10) while Multiple Llms has 3 (avg severity 3.8/10). Multiple Llms shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Lovable and Multiple Llms failures?
Lovable's most common failure mode is security vulnerability, while Multiple Llms most commonly fails via hallucination. Lovable has 1 critical incidents vs Multiple Llms's 0.