Cursor
5
Incidents
6.1
Avg Severity
2
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Destructive Action
1
Infinite Loop
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0029 10/10Malicious cloned repository triggered code execution in Cursor on Windows
Gitlab Duo
1
Incidents
10.0
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0061 10/10A hidden comment made GitLab Duo leak private source code and inject rogue HTML
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Cursor | Gitlab Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Severity | 6.1/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 2 | 1 |
| Top Failure Mode | Security Vulnerability | Security Vulnerability |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cursor or Gitlab Duo more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Cursor has 5 documented failures (avg severity 6.1/10) while Gitlab Duo has 1 (avg severity 10.0/10). Cursor shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Cursor and Gitlab Duo failures?
Cursor's most common failure mode is security vulnerability, while Gitlab Duo most commonly fails via security vulnerability. Cursor has 2 critical incidents vs Gitlab Duo's 1.