Claude Code vs Openai Operator

AI Agent Reliability Comparison

Claude Code

8
Incidents
6.4
Avg Severity
3
Critical
2
High

Top Failure Modes

Destructive Action 3
Other 2
Security Vulnerability 2

Worst Incident

STUPID-2026-0003 10/10
Claude Code ran rm -rf on test fixtures thinking they were temp files

Openai Operator

1
Incidents
4.4
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High

Top Failure Modes

Logic Error 1

Worst Incident

STUPID-2026-0059 4.4/10
OpenAI's Operator scored 38% on real computer tasks — and panics instead of recovering from errors

Comparison Summary

Metric Claude Code Openai Operator
Total Incidents 8 1
Avg Severity 6.4/10 4.4/10
Critical Incidents 3 0
Top Failure Mode Destructive Action Logic Error

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Code or Openai Operator more reliable?

Based on StupidLLM data, Claude Code has 8 documented failures (avg severity 6.4/10) while Openai Operator has 1 (avg severity 4.4/10). Openai Operator shows better reliability based on average severity scores.

What are the main differences between Claude Code and Openai Operator failures?

Claude Code's most common failure mode is destructive action, while Openai Operator most commonly fails via logic error. Claude Code has 3 critical incidents vs Openai Operator's 0.