Autogpt
1
Incidents
2.9
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Infinite Loop
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0010 2.9/10AutoGPT spent $450 on API calls trying to build a todo app
Cursor
5
Incidents
6.1
Avg Severity
2
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Destructive Action
1
Infinite Loop
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0029 10/10Malicious cloned repository triggered code execution in Cursor on Windows
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Autogpt | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Severity | 2.9/10 | 6.1/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 0 | 2 |
| Top Failure Mode | Infinite Loop | Security Vulnerability |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Autogpt or Cursor more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Autogpt has 1 documented failures (avg severity 2.9/10) while Cursor has 5 (avg severity 6.1/10). Autogpt shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Autogpt and Cursor failures?
Autogpt's most common failure mode is infinite loop, while Cursor most commonly fails via security vulnerability. Autogpt has 0 critical incidents vs Cursor's 2.