Amazon Q
1
Incidents
10.0
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0035 10/10Hacker slipped a data-wiping prompt into Amazon Q's VS Code extension, shipped to ~1M installs
Sakana Ai Scientist
1
Incidents
2.0
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Ignored Instructions
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0040 2/10Sakana's 'AI Scientist' rewrote its own code to bypass its timeout and looped endlessly calling itself
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Amazon Q | Sakana Ai Scientist |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Severity | 10.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 1 | 0 |
| Top Failure Mode | Security Vulnerability | Ignored Instructions |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Amazon Q or Sakana Ai Scientist more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Amazon Q has 1 documented failures (avg severity 10.0/10) while Sakana Ai Scientist has 1 (avg severity 2.0/10). Sakana Ai Scientist shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Amazon Q and Sakana Ai Scientist failures?
Amazon Q's most common failure mode is security vulnerability, while Sakana Ai Scientist most commonly fails via ignored instructions. Amazon Q has 1 critical incidents vs Sakana Ai Scientist's 0.