Amazon Q
1
Incidents
10.0
Avg Severity
1
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Security Vulnerability
1
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0035 10/10Hacker slipped a data-wiping prompt into Amazon Q's VS Code extension, shipped to ~1M installs
Multiple Llms
3
Incidents
3.8
Avg Severity
0
Critical
0
High
Top Failure Modes
Hallucination
3
Worst Incident
STUPID-2026-0033 6.4/10Slopsquatting: LLMs hallucinate package names attackers pre-register (react-codeshift, unused-imports)
Comparison Summary
| Metric | Amazon Q | Multiple Llms |
|---|---|---|
| Total Incidents | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Severity | 10.0/10 | 3.8/10 |
| Critical Incidents | 1 | 0 |
| Top Failure Mode | Security Vulnerability | Hallucination |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Amazon Q or Multiple Llms more reliable?
Based on StupidLLM data, Amazon Q has 1 documented failures (avg severity 10.0/10) while Multiple Llms has 3 (avg severity 3.8/10). Multiple Llms shows better reliability based on average severity scores.
What are the main differences between Amazon Q and Multiple Llms failures?
Amazon Q's most common failure mode is security vulnerability, while Multiple Llms most commonly fails via hallucination. Amazon Q has 1 critical incidents vs Multiple Llms's 0.